Logo.dev vs LogoKit

Both serve company, stock and crypto logos from an image URL. Logo.dev's free plan is larger and allows storage; LogoKit adds facts such as founding year.

Last updated 2026-11-10

Both serve logos for companies, stock tickers and crypto symbols from an image URL with a publishable key, and both have a Brand API with a secret key and an MCP server. Logo.dev is cheaper and less restrictive; LogoKit returns more company facts.

Logo.devLogoKit
JobOne-off lookupsOne-off lookups
What it gives you
LogosYesYes
ColoursYesYes
FontsNoNo
GuidanceNoNo
FilesPartlyNo
Access and cost
You sendA domain, ticker, ISIN, crypto symbol or nameA domain, ticker, ISIN or crypto symbol
AuthenticationPublishable key for images; secret key for the APIPublishable token for logos; secret token for the API
Free tier500,000 logo requests and $5 of API credits a month5,000 logos a day at 64 px, with a link to LogoKit
Paid from$33 a month (Startup)$40 a month (Startup)
MCP serverYesYes, on paid plans
Checked2026-11-102026-11-10

Choose Logo.dev if

  • You want a larger free plan: 500,000 logo requests a month, against LogoKit's 5,000 a day at 64 pixels.
  • You want to store logos on your own servers. Logo.dev allows it on every plan; LogoKit only on Enterprise.
  • You want the lower paid plan: $33 a month against $40.

Choose LogoKit if

  • You want company facts with the logo: founding year, employee range, address and industry classification (GICS).
  • You look up stocks by CUSIP as well as ticker and ISIN.
  • You want a generated monogram when no logo exists. LogoKit returns one unless you ask for a 404.

What do they have in common?

  • Free commercial use needs a visible link to the provider on both.
  • Logo images are meant to load in your users' browsers, not be fetched by a script.

Sources